1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 914 S.W.2d
  5. 914 S.W.2d 142 (1995)
 

BURNAP v. LINNARTZ

No. 04-94-00303-CV.

914 S.W.2d 142 (1995)

Willard BURNAP, Appellant, v. Lawrence R. LINNARTZ; Ingram Linnartz & Reynolds, P.C.; William R. Rork; and McCamish & Martin, P.C., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio.

Rehearing Overruled October 6, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul E. Knisely, Broadus A. Spivey, Thomas P. Prehoditch, Spivey, Grigg, Kelly & Knisely, Austin, for appellant.

James E. Ingram, James M. Parker, Jr., Butler & Binion, L.L.P., Damon Ball, Ryan G. Anderson, Ball & Weed, P.C., J. Patrick Deely, Bennett L. Stahl, McCamish & Martin, P.C., San Antonio, Joe W. Matthews, Smith & Moore, Dallas, Jonathan David Pauerstein, Lopez & Pauerstein, P.C., San Antonio, for appellees.

Before CHAPA, C.J., and STONE and GREEN, JJ.

OPINION

STONE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant lawyers in a legal malpractice action. The appellant, Willard Burnap, contends numerous unresolved fact issues preclude summary judgment. We agree that material issues of fact remain regarding the existence of an attorney-client relationship, and that these issues must be submitted to a jury. We find, however, that Burnap's claims against appellees William...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases