1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 44 F.3d
  5. 44 F.3d 998 (1995)
 

HAINES v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BD.

No. 94-3065.

44 F.3d 998 (1995)

Deborah L. HAINES, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

January 5, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rosemarie Rhodes, Harper & Paul, Philadelphia, PA, argued, for petitioner.

Eric D. Flores, Atty., Merit Systems Protection Bd., Washington, DC, argued, for respondent. Mary L. Jennings, Acting Gen. Counsel, Martha B. Schneider, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Rita S. Arendal, Atty., Merit Systems Protection Bd., Washington, DC, were on the brief, for respondent. Reginald T. Blades, Jr., David M. Cohen and James M. Kinsella, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

Before MAYER, MICHEL, and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges.

MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Deborah L. Haines petitions for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board's failure to reopen her appeal and reconsider its final decision in her case. Because the letter from the Clerk of the Board informing Ms. Haines that the Board did not plan to reopen her appeal is not a "final order or decision" of the Board, the only kind of Board action over which we may exercise appellate subject matter jurisdiction under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases