Though directed by Supreme Court to do so, and having had some four months to accomplish it, plaintiff failed to secure substitute counsel so that this personal injury action could be restored to the trial calendar. This directive was prompted by the fact that, in April 1993, plaintiff's then-counsel had withdrawn from the case on the eve of trial. In these circumstances, the court cannot be faulted for having granted defendant's motion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
