1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 903 F.Supp.
  5. 903 F.Supp. 133 (1995)
 

WAINWRIGHT v. WASH. METRO. AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

Civ. A. No. 93-0044 (RCL).

903 F.Supp. 133 (1995)

Peter J. WAINWRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Schindler Elevator Company, Westinghouse Electric Corporation, and Westinghouse Elevator Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

October 17, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Brian Cave, Emily M. Yinger, Hogan & Hartson, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Robert John Kniaz, Gerard Joseph Stief, WMATA, Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC, for WMATA.

Edward T. Longosz, Miles & Stockbridge, Washington, DC, for Schindler Elevator Company.

Adam White Smith, Fairfax, VA, for Westinghouse (Both Defendants).

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LAMBERTH, District Judge.

Defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority ("WMATA") has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Upon consideration of the filings of counsel and the relevant law, WMATA's motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted with respect to count three (failure to warn), count six (strict liability for design defects), count seven (strict...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases