BRIAN v. OREGON GOVERNMENT ETHICS COM'N

CA A78275.

888 P.2d 129 (1995)

132 Or.App. 373

Representative Tom BRIAN, Petitioner, v. OREGON GOVERNMENT ETHICS COMMISSION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 4, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marc D. Blackman, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Ransom, Blackman & Weil.

John T. Bagg, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and HASELTON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

On remand from the Supreme Court, 319 Or. 151, 874 P.2d 1294 (1994), we consider the merits of petitioner's arguments disputing the propriety of the respondent Commission's inclusion of the "Opinion" section in its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Final Order in this case. We reject those arguments. See Garton v. Real Estate Commissioner, 127 Or.App. 340...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases