1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 70 F.3d
  5. 70 F.3d 944 (1995)
 

WILLIAMS v. U.S. STEEL, DIV. OF USX CORP.

No. 95-1859.

70 F.3d 944 (1995)

Mitchell WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES STEEL, a DIVISION OF USX CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided November 29, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rudy C. Kutansky (argued), Kutansky & Associates, Gary, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

S.G. Clark (argued), U.S. Steel Group Law Department, Pittsburgh, PA, James E. McHie, McHie, Myers, McHie & Enslen, Hammond, IN, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before BAUER, MANION, and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

Does "since" mean "because" or does "since" mean "after"? Today's case requires us to explore this seemingly simple definition, because approximately $25,000 in back pay hinges on our interpretation.

Before us is Mitchell Williams' appeal of the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of U.S. Steel. Notwithstanding the aforementioned problem in defining "since", the material facts of Williams' grievance are not in dispute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases