Aaron ABRAMSON, et al.
v.
FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION CO., et al.
United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 21, 1995.
April 21, 1995.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Karen Delcambre McCarthy, Lanny R. Zatzkis, Yvette Anne D'Aunoy, Zatzkis & Associates, New Orleans, Louis B. Merhige, Metairie, LA, for Aaron Abramson.
Louis B. Merhige, Metairie, LA, for Alfred Abramson, Joseph Abramson, Carol Abramson Schudmak, Eugenie Marrus Abramson, Steven M. Brainis, Joseph M. Brainis, David Brainis, Lucy Abramson Brainis, Debra Brainis Lester, Sara Brainis Rambin, Ethel Abramson.
Michael Ray Mangham, Michael J. O'Shee, Mangham & Hardy, Lafayette, LA, Louis P. Soldano, Florida Gas Transmission Co., Houston, TX, for Florida Gas Transmission Co.
Bryan David Fisher, Hank Seldon Hannah, Hannah, Colvin & Pipes, Baton Rouge, LA, for Ralston & Associates, Inc.
Stephen Louis Huber, Borrello, Huber & Dubuclet, Metairie, Lawrence Emig Larmann, W. Evan Plauché, Hailey, McNamara, Hall, Larmann & Papale, Metairie, LA, for Henkels & McCoy Inc.
Lawrence Emig Larmann, Dominic J. Ovella, W. Evan Plauché, Hailey, McNamara, Hall, Larmann & Papale, Metairie, LA, for Liberty Mut. Ins. Group.
Eric Shuman, McGlinchey, Stafford, Stafford & Lang ALC, New Orleans, LA, for Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh.
Stephen Louis Huber, Borrello, Huber & Dubuclet, Lawrence Emig Larmann, Dominic J. Ovella, W. Evan Plauché, Metairie, LA, for Henkles & McCoy Inc.
Russell Louis Sylvester, Brittain & Sylvester, Natchitoches, LA, for Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
Eric Shuman, McGlinchey, Stafford, & Lang ALC, New Orleans, LA, Richard W. Bryan, Jackson & Campbell, Washington, DC, for Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA.
United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana.
ORDER AND REASONS
JONES, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a "Motion for Clarification and/or Reconsideration on Ruling on Motion to Dismiss Henkels & McCoy's Counter-Claim" filed by Henkels & McCoy, Inc. This motion was submitted without oral argument on a previous date. Having reviewed the memoranda of the parties, the record and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS the motion only to explain its rationale for its prior ruling and to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
