1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 65 F.3d
  5. 65 F.3d 941 (1995)
 

KING INSTRUMENTS CORP. v. PEREGO

Nos. 91-1125, 91-1132.

65 F.3d 941 (1995)

KING INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Luciano PEREGO and Tapematic, Defendant/Cross-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

September 19, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Brezner, Richard F. Trecartin and Richard P. Doyle, Jr., Flehr, Hohbach, Test, Albritton & Herbert, of San Francisco, CA, were on the brief for plaintiff-appellant. Also on the brief was Nicholas A. Pandiscio, Schiller, Pandiscio & Kusmer, of Cambridge, MA, of counsel.

Edgar H. Haug, Adam L. Brookman and Mary Ann G. Mullen, Curtis, Morris & Safford, P.C., of New York City, were on the brief for defendant/cross-appellants.

Before NIES, NEWMAN, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion of the court filed by Circuit Judge RADER. Dissenting-in-part opinion filed by Circuit Judge NIES.

RADER, Circuit Judge.

King Instrument Corporation (King) sued Luciano Perego and Tapematic SrL (Tapematic) for infringement of U.S. Patents Nos. 3,637,153 (the '153 patent), 3,825,461 (the '461 patent), and 3,997,123 (the '123 patent). The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts awarded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases