1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 218 A.D.2d
  5. 218 A.D.2d 784 (1995)
 

INGEBRETSEN v. MANHA

218 A.D.2d 784 (1995)

631 N.Y.S.2d 72

Erica Ingebretsen, Appellant, v. Antone Manha, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

August 28, 1995

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that the trial court has broad discretion in controlling the conduct of the trial, which includes limiting the scope of direct, cross, and redirect examination (see, Feldsberg v Nitschke, 49 N.Y.2d 636). A witness's answers may not be challenged concerning collateral matters through the production of extrinsic evidence for the sole purpose of impeaching...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases