Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his claims of error with respect to the admission of background evidence offered to explain that it is not unusual that no purchase money be recovered, and the prosecutor's remark that the courtroom should be sealed for the undercover officer's testimony (see, People v Tevaha,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.