Ordered that the appeal from the order dated September 2, 1993, is dismissed; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated October 18, 1991, is affirmed; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.
That branch of the petitioners' motion which was to renew was based upon facts that could have been raised at the time of the original motion, and the petitioners offered no excuse for their failure to present the evidence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.