1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 13 F.3d
  5. 13 F.3d 986 (1994)
 

U.S. v. TAYLOR

Nos. 92-6548, 92-6549.

13 F.3d 986 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald TAYLOR (92-6548); and Michael Nash (92-6549), Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided January 14, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel A. Clancy, U.S. Atty., Joseph C. Murphy, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued and briefed), Memphis, TN, for U.S.

Timothy R. Holton (briefed), Crow & Holton, Memphis, TN, for Ronald Taylor.

Stephen B. Shankman (briefed), Patricia A. Crowell (argued), Monroe, Shankman & Kaufman, Memphis, TN, for Michael Nash.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge, and BROWN and WELLFORD, Senior Circuit Judges.

MERRITT, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from defendants' convictions for violations of federal narcotics and firearms laws. The most significant issue is a mandatory minimum sentencing question raised by the court sua sponte at oral argument, the issue discussed below in Section IV.

A five-count indictment was filed in the Western District of Tennessee on September 11, 1990, against six defendants, including Nash and Taylor. Count 1 charged Nash and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases