1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 651 A.2d
  5. 651 A.2d 347 (1994)
 

BOWDEN v. GRINDLE

651 A.2d 347 (1994)

Ruth D. BOWDEN v. Edward B. GRINDLE et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided December 20, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry K. Mills, Hale & Hamlin, Ellsworth, for plaintiff.

William N. Ferm, Ferm, McSweeney & Collier, Ellsworth, for defendants.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, and DANA, JJ.

DANA, Justice.

Ruth D. Bowden appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Hancock County, Mead, J.) contending that the court erred by its determination that the court was bound by the advisory jury verdict that the statute of limitations barred her claim for rescission of a deed given to Edward B. and Prudence E. Grindle. The Grindles cross-appeal, contending that if Bowden prevails, they should not be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases