ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Claimant appeals from the decision of the Commission denying him workers' compensation benefits for his occupational disease claim. We affirm. The Commission's findings are supported by competent and substantial evidence and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(4) and (5).
We find a written opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.