1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 871 P.2d
  5. 871 P.2d 125 (1994)
 

ITT HARTFORD INS. GROUP v. NICHOLLS

WCB 91-01349; CA A77429.

871 P.2d 125 (1994)

126 Or. App. 633

In the Matter of the Compensation of James W. Nicholls, Claimant. ITT HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP and Cotter and Company, Petitioners, v. James W. NICHOLLS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 2, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen R. Frank argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Alison K. Greene and Tooze Shenker Duden Creamer Frank Hutchison.

Michael Dehner argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Daniel J. DeNorch and Schneider, DeNorch & Galaviz-Stoller.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and LANDAU, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board holding that the Board did not have jurisdiction to determine whether chiropractic care that claimant had received was approved by claimant's attending physician and whether the treatment was palliative or curative.1

We recently held that a dispute over whether medical treatment that has already been received is palliative or curative is a matter covered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases