1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 228 Conn.
  5. 228 Conn. 766 (1994)
 

SUFFIELD BANK v. BERMAN

(14779)

228 Conn. 766 (1994)

SUFFIELD BANK v. WILLIAM W. BERMAN ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released March 22, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard P. Weinstein, for the appellants (named defendant et al.).

William H. Narwold, with whom were Charles D. Ray and, on the brief, David D. Legere, for the appellee (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation).

PETERS, C. J., BERDON, NORCOTT, KATZ and PALMER, Js.

KATZ, J.

The defendants William W. Berman, James J. Luzzi and Thomas E. Kohanski appeal from the judgments for deficiency after strict foreclosure had been entered against them.1 The defendants argue that the trial court's judgments must be reversed because the trial court improperly: (1) refused, at the hearing on the motions for deficiency judgment, to allow them to challenge, on a mitigation of damages theory, the accrual of interest...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases