1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 519 N.W.2d
  5. 519 N.W.2d 474 (1994)
 

BROWN v. TONKA CORP.

No. C5-94-487.

519 N.W.2d 474 (1994)

Gary D. BROWN, et al., Respondents, v. TONKA CORPORATION, a wholly owned subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

July 26, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George R. Wood, Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Todd M. Johnson, Patrick J. Neaton, Chamberlain, Neaton & Johnson, Wayzata, for respondent.

Considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., HARTEN and SCHULTZ, JJ.

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

In challenging summary judgment, appellant employer contends that a revised company vacation policy did not entitle respondents to the vacation benefits they claim in this action. The trial court did not err in determining that respondents were entitled to their 1991 vacation benefits. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondents Gary D. Brown and Rhonda J. Brandt are former employees of appellant Tonka Corporation. In 1991, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases