1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 877 P.2d
  5. 877 P.2d 112 (1994)
 

WIDMER BREWING CO. v. ROLPH

9207-04599; CA A79936.

877 P.2d 112 (1994)

128 Or. App. 666

WIDMER BREWING COMPANY, an Oregon corporation, Appellant, v. Kevin ROLPH and Carole Rolph, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 29, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barton C. Bobbitt, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Bobbitt & Laster, P.C.

Kim T. Buckley, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Esler, Stephens & Buckley.

Before De MUNIZ, P.J., and LANDAU and LEESON, JJ.

De MUNIZ, Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action against defendants for breach of contract, breach of a joint venture agreement and fraud. Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for defendants on all three claims. We affirm.

Summary judgment is appropriate when the record shows that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ORCP 47 C; Seeborg v. General Motors Corporation,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases