STATE v. THOMPSON

No. CX-93-2001.

520 N.W.2d 468 (1994)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. William Troy THOMPSON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied October 27, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradford S. Delapena, Sp. Asst. State Public Defender, St. Paul, for appellant.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, and Michael O. Freeman, Hennepin Co. Atty., J. Michael Richardson, Asst. Co. Atty., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by SHORT, P.J., and SCHUMACHER and HARTEN, JJ.


OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellant William Troy Thompson contends that the trial court erred by allowing respondent State of Minnesota to introduce evidence concerning his allegedly dangerous character and the battering that several witnesses had allegedly suffered at the hands of other men. Thompson also claims that the prosecution made improper remarks during the trial. We affirm.

FACTS

On February 23, 1993, K.W. arrived home from work...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases