1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 519 N.W.2d
  5. 519 N.W.2d 460 (1994)
 

FORD MOTOR CREDIT CO. v. RUSSELL

No. CX-93-2581.

519 N.W.2d 460 (1994)

FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, Respondent, v. Dawn M. RUSSELL, et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. MONTICELLO FORD AND MERCURY, INC., Third-Party Defendant, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied September 28, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard G. Nadler, Thomas J. Lyons, Steven T. Appelget, St. Paul, for appellants.

Vernle C. Durocher, Jr., Sharon M. Dobbs, Minneapolis, for Ford Motor Credit Co.

Stephan A. Pezalla, Golden Valley, for Monticello Ford and Mercury, Inc.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, P.J., and HUSPENI and AMUNDSON, JJ.

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellants Dawn Russell and David Russell challenge entry of summary judgment in favor of respondents Ford Motor Credit Company and Monticello Ford and Mercury, Inc. on appellants' claims for breach of contract, violation of the Minnesota Motor Vehicle Retail Installment Sales Act, the Federal Truth in Lending Act, and the Federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act. Because we find that the automobile advertisement did not constitute an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases