MOINE v. OREGON GOVERNMENT ETHICS COM'N

92E-326; CA A81630.

877 P.2d 96 (1994)

128 Or. App. 681

Robert MOINE, Petitioner, v. OREGON GOVERNMENT ETHICS COMMISSION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 29, 1994.

Review Denied September 27, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Judith N. Selich argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the reply brief was Litchfield & Carstens.

Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and LEESON and HASELTON, JJ.


LEESON, Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of an Oregon Government Ethics Commission (Commission) order that required him to pay civil penalties totalling $9,000 and to forfeit $90,437. The sole issue is whether the Commission has authority to investigate and punish violations of ORS chapter 244 that were committed by a person as a public official, if that person is no longer a public official. We hold that the Commission has that authority.

The facts are not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases