Since the court sustained defense counsel's objections to the prosecutor's misstatements regarding the method by which the court had notified defense counsel of a change in the date on which defendant, who had been released on parole, was scheduled to return to court, and since the jury is presumed to have followed the court's instruction to disregard any testimony that has been stricken from the record (People v Davis,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. HOWARD
207 A.D.2d 751 (1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 731
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lamont Howard, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 29, 1994
September 29, 1994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
