We reject defendant's argument that his confession should have been suppressed at the Huntley hearing because it was obtained as a result of an impermissible promise made by law enforcement personnel. We find no evidence that County Court abused its considerable discretion by crediting the contrary testimony of the investigating police officer. Because defendant's statement to the police was voluntary, there is no basis for reversing defendant's conviction.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.