Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was not legally sufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review. The arguments the defendant now raises on appeal were not made with specificity in his two motions for a trial order of dismissal in the Supreme Court (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.