1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 36 Conn.
  5. 36 Conn. App. 59 (1994)
 

JOHNSON v. STATE

(12591)

36 Conn. App. 59 (1994)

KEITH JOHNSON v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decision released September 13, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Drew, law student intern, with whom were Brian J. Kornbrath, and, on the brief, Donald Mahoney, law student intern, for the appellant (petitioner).

James M. Ralls, assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were James Thomas, state's attorney, and Edward Narus, assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (respondent).

O'CONNELL, FREEDMAN and SPEAR, JS.

O'CONNELL, J.

Pursuant to General Statutes § 52-270,1 the petitioner brought this petition for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Following an adverse ruling, the petitioner appealed to this court claiming that the trial court was obligated to order a new trial because the victim recanted his identification testimony. Related to this claim is the petitioner's argument...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases