U.S. v. HOBBS

No. 93-50247.

31 F.3d 918 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur HOBBS, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 9, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Callie A. Glanton, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellant.

Daniel P. Collins, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: BROWNING and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges and FITZGERALD, District Judge.


OPINION

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Arthur Hobbs appeals his conviction based on a conditional guilty plea for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Hobbs contends that the district court abused its discretion by precluding two defense witnesses from testifying at a suppression hearing after the witnesses violated a witness sequestration order. We have jurisdiction and we reverse.

I...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases