Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the trial court erred by limiting the prosecution and defense counsels' choice for alternate jurors to their respective prior peremptorily-challenged venire-persons. This issue has not been preserved for appellate review, since the defense counsel specifically stated that she had no objection to the court's method for the selection of alternate jurors (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
