On this appeal, defendant claims that he was not provided with a reasonable adjournment in City Court to allow for his appearance. Initially, defendant elected to send an employee to represent him at the trial. During the course of the trial, however, an adjournment was requested so that defendant himself could appear. City Court permitted a one-hour adjournment. Defendant did not appear, however, citing his busy dental practice as the reason. Given these facts, we find no...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
