Plaintiffs argue that Supreme Court improperly denied their motion for a further extension of time to file a note of issue. Assuming, arguendo, that all issues raised by the parties are properly before us, we conclude that Supreme Court's decision need not be disturbed. We have examined the excuses plaintiffs have proffered for their delay and find that they are not persuasive, especially in light of the broad discretion possessed by Supreme Court in considering such motions...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
