1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 881 P.2d
  5. 881 P.2d 57 (1994)
 

STATE v. RICKARD

Nos. 14566, 14591, 14503, 14458 and 14866.

881 P.2d 57 (1994)

118 N.M. 312

STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donnie RICKARD, Defendant-Appellant. STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charlene JONES, a/k/a Charlene Frazier, Defendant-Appellant. STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bonnie Ray WRIGHTER, Defendant-Appellant. STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patricia PRICE, Defendant-Appellant. STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald Ray WOODS, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

Certiorari Granted August 15, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tom Udall, Atty. Gen., Margaret McLean, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, attorneys for plaintiff-appellee in No. 14566.

Sammy J. Quintana, Chief Public Defender, Christopher Bulman, Asst. Appellate Defender, Santa Fe, attorneys for defendant-appellant in No. 14566.

Tom Udall, Atty. Gen., William McEuen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, attorneys for plaintiff-appellee in No. 14591.

Sammy J. Quintana, Chief Public Defender, Rita LaLumia, Asst. Appellate Defender, Santa Fe, attorneys for defendant-appellant in Nos. 14591, 14503 and 14458.

Tom Udall, Atty. Gen., Ann M. Harvey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, attorneys for plaintiff-appellee in No. 14503.

Tom Udall, Atty. Gen., Anthony Tupler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, attorneys for plaintiff-appellee in No. 14458.

Tom Udall, Atty. Gen., William McEuen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, attorneys for plaintiff-appellee in No. 14866.

John H. Tull, Jr., Tull & Cherry, Santa Fe, attorneys for defendant-appellant in No. 14866.

OPINION

FLORES, Judge.

This opinion addresses five appeals by five Defendants who were convicted of possession of cocaine. Each Defendant was subjected to random urinalysis testing as a condition of probation or parole and tested positive for the presence of cocaine. Subsequently, each Defendant was charged and prosecuted for possession of cocaine. Because Defendants challenge whether their urine test results were privileged information improperly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases