Claimant was employed as a claims analyst. Claimant, after using vulgar language in an argument with a co-worker, was warned that such language was inappropriate and not acceptable. Claimant subsequently again used vulgar language while at work and, when called to her supervisor's office to discuss the incident, walked out of the meeting. We therefore find substantial evidence to support the Board's decision that this conduct constituted misconduct.
Ordered that the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
