1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 520 N.W.2d
  5. 520 N.W.2d 406 (1994)
 

ROUSE v. DUNKLEY & BENNETT, P.A.

No. C6-93-777.

520 N.W.2d 406 (1994)

Alan ROUSE, Respondent, v. DUNKLEY & BENNETT, P.A., et al., Petitioners, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Rehearing Denied October 20, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Degnan, Charles E. Lundberg, Bassford, Heckt, Lockhart, Truesdell & Briggs, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellants.

Thomas J. Lyons, Mary C. Ivory, Lyons Sawicki Neese, P.A., St. Paul, for respondent.

HEARD, considered and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

GARDEBRING, Justice.

Respondent in this case, Alan Rouse, filed a legal malpractice action in 1990 against the appellant law firm, Dunkley & Bennett, P.A., alleging that the firm's lawyers were negligent in representing him in a lawsuit against his former employer. Appellants Dunkley & Bennett ("the lawyers") had represented Rouse in the lawsuit, which ended in a stipulated default judgment against the former employer for $100,000.00.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases