Respondent found that petitioner's alleged injury was not the result of a sudden, fortuitous mischance which was unexpected or out of the ordinary. Instead, respondent determined that it resulted from a risk inherent in the task petitioner was performing while he was employed as a police officer. Accordingly, respondent concluded that the injury did not constitute an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law. Because this determination denying...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.