CATHERINE LEEPER, Respondent,
v.
THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Petitioner. DONALD TAASEVIGEN, Respondent,
v.
THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Appellant. JANICE M. JONES, Respondent,
v.
THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Appellant.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 21, 1994.
April 21, 1994.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Christine O. Gregoire, Attorney General, and Gayle Barry and Nancy Thygesen Day, Senior Counsel, for the State.
Counsel, Murphy & Bottiger, P.S., by John P. Murphy, for respondent Leeper.
David B. Vail & Associates, by Todd R. Renda, for respondent Taasevigen.
Small, Snell & Weiss, by Richard E. Weiss, for respondent Jones.
John D. Fairley on behalf of Washington Self-Insurers Association, amicus curiae.
Gary N. Bloom, Bryan P. Harnetiaux, and Michael J. Pontarolo on behalf of Washington State Trial Lawyers Association, amicus curiae for respondents.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
GUY, J.
We here decide whether evidence of a worker's inability to obtain employment is relevant to determining if an injury has left a worker permanently and totally disabled. In 1989, the Washington Supreme Court Committee on Jury Instructions added the phrase "or obtain" to the pattern instruction which defined permanent total disability in workers' compensation cases. The previous edition of the instruction defined total...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.