Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent City of Long Beach.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim and granting the municipal defendant's cross motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; Frick v Incorporated Vil. of Hempstead,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.