1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 886 S.W.2d
  5. 886 S.W.2d 34 (1994)
 

STATE EX REL. COMPETITIVE TEL. v. MO. PSC

Nos. WD 48802, WD 48824, WD 48825 and WD 48826.

886 S.W.2d 34 (1994)

STATE ex rel. COMPETITIVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, Plaintiff, MCI Telecommunications Corp., Midwest Independent Coin Payphone Association, Missouri Office of the Public Counsel, Kansas City Cable Partners, Appellants, v. MISSOURI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Respondents, Small Telephone Company Group, Intervenor. STATE ex rel. COMPETITIVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, Plaintiff, Midwest Independent Coin Payphone Association, Appellant, v. MISSOURI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, Respondent. STATE ex rel. COMPETITIVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, Plaintiff, Missouri Office of the Public Counsel, Appellant, v. MISSOURI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, Respondent. STATE ex rel. COMPETITIVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, Plaintiff, Kansas City Cable Partners, Appellant, v. MISSOURI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied October 4, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied November 22, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl James Lumley, Clayton, for MCI Telecommunications Corp.

William M. Barvick, Jefferson City, for Midwest Independent Coin Payphone Ass'n.

Martha S. Hogerty, Jefferson City, for Missouri Office of Public Counsel.

Mark P. Johnson, Kansas City, for Kansas City Cable Partners.

Robert J. Hack, Cherlyn D. McGowan, Jefferson City, for Missouri Public Service Com'n.

Ann Effinger Meuleman, St. Louis, for Southwestern Bell.

William Ross England, III, Jefferson City, for intervenor Small Telephone Co. Group.

Before TURNAGE, P.J., and FENNER and HANNA, JJ.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 4, 1994.

FENNER, Judge.

This is a consolidated appeal from a decision of the circuit court which affirmed a decision of respondent, Missouri Public Service Commission (Commission). The decision in question classified certain services of respondent, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (Southwestern Bell) as transitionally competitive. Appellants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases