1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 185 Wis.2d
  5. 185 Wis.2d 728 (1994)
 

STATE v. VERSTOPPEN

No. 93-2673-CR.

185 Wis.2d 728 (1994)

519 N.W.2d 653

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Frederic VERSTOPPEN, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided June 1, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-respondent the cause was submitted on the briefs of William A. Pangman of Law Offices of William A. Pangman & Associates, S.C. of Waukesha.

For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general and Gregroy Posner-Weber, assistant attorney general.

Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque and Myse, JJ.

MYSE, J.

Frederic Verstoppen appeals a trial court order denying his motion to modify his sentence. Verstoppen contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by refusing to modify his sentence based on its conclusion that acquittal of the charges against him that resulted in his probation revocation, while a new factor, did not justify a modification of the sentence imposed upon his probation revocation. Verstoppen argues that (1) the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases