CHURM v. PRUDENTIAL PROP. & CAS. INS. CO.


276 N.J. Super. 631 (1994)

648 A.2d 741

CARRIE ANN CHURM, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 26, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Berlin, Kaplan, Dembling & Burke, attorneys for appellant (John Burke, on the brief).

William J. Vosper, Jr., attorney for respondent (Neil A. DeCostanza, on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, STERN and KEEFE.


The opinion of the court was delivered by KEEFE, J.A.D.

On leave granted, Prudential Property and Casualty Co. (Prudential) appeals from an interlocutory order of the Law Division denying Prudential's motion to dismiss plaintiff's case, while granting, instead, plaintiff's application for a trial de novo pursuant to R. 4:21A-6. The issue to be decided on appeal is whether plaintiff, Carrie Churm, having submitted a claim for personal injury protection...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases