1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 888 P.2d
  5. 888 P.2d 16 (1994)
 

THOMPSON v. TELEPHONE & DATA SYSTEMS

9005-03082; CA A74557.

888 P.2d 16 (1994)

132 Or.App. 103

Ellis THOMPSON, an individual, and Ellis Thompson Corporation, an Oregon corporation, Respondents, v. TELEPHONE & DATA SYSTEMS, INC., an Iowa corporation; United States Cellular Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Appellants, and Amcell of Atlantic City, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 21, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

N. Robert Stoll, David A. Lokting, Sandra L. Kohn, Stoll, Stoll, Berne & Lokting, G. Frank Hammond, O'Donnell, Ramis, Crew & Corrigan, Portland, Michael D. Hays, David E. Mills, and Dow, Lohnes & Albertson, Washington, DC, for motion.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and LANDAU, JJ.

On Respondents' Motion for Reconsideration October 13, 1994.

LANDAU, Judge.

Plaintiffs and defendant Amcell of Atlantic City (Amcell) move for reconsideration of our opinion, 130 Or.App. 302, 881 P.2d 819 (1994), in which we held that the trial court erred in granting their motion for judgment on the pleadings on the basis of its judicial notice of a document that was supposedly appended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases