Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the allegations in the underlying complaint involve acts which are not covered under the plaintiff's insurance policy. Therefore, the defendant Cigna Property and Casualty Companies has no duty to defend the plaintiff in the underlying action (see, Meyers & Sons Corp. v Zurich Am. Ins. Group,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.