U.S. v. DORRI

No. 92-50339.

15 F.3d 888 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harry Armondo DORRI, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided February 3, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Guy C. Iversen, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellant Harry Armondo Dorri.

Saul D. Brenner, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, California, for plaintiff-appellee United States of America.

Before: KOZINSKI, SILER, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.


SILER, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Harry Armondo Dorri appeals his conviction for soliciting a bribe pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 201(b)(2)(A). The only issue on appeal is whether the district court erred by failing to respond more explicitly to an inquiry by a deliberating jury concerning the definition of the word "corruptly." Finding no error, we affirm the ruling of the district court.

THE FACTS

Dorri was an employee of the Immigration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases