IN RE WHIPPLE

OSB 91-174, 91-175, 92-23, 92-24, 93-55, 93-57; SC 29728.

886 P.2d 7 (1994)

320 Or. 476

In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF Jay W. WHIPPLE, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided December 29, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martha M. Hicks, Asst. Disciplinary Counsel, Or. State Bar, Lake Oswego, and Mark P. Bronstein, Bar Counsel, Portland, for the Oregon State Bar.

No appearance contra.


PER CURIAM.

In this disciplinary case, the Oregon State Bar received complaints concerning the accused's handling of legal matters involving several different clients. The Bar thereafter brought the present proceeding against the accused, charging 23 violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The most serious charges are that the accused violated Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3)1 in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases