Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the hearing court properly denied suppression of a pre-Miranda statement he made to an officer while at the crime scene, in response to a question asked by the officer. The questioning by the officer did not constitute a custodial interrogation for which the administration of Miranda warnings was required (see, People v Huffman,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
