1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 871 F.Supp.
  5. 871 F.Supp. 18 (1994)
 

PRINCZ v. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY

Civ. A. No. 92-644.

871 F.Supp. 18 (1994)

Hugo PRINCZ, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, BASF Group, Hoechst AG, Bayer Group, and Messerschmidt-Belkow-Blohm, Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

December 8, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Edward Sher, Sher & Cummings, Arlington, VA and Steven R. Perles, Washington, DC, for plaintiff.

Kathleen Spear Rice, Thomas Gardiner Corcoran, Jr., Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe, Washington, DC and Peter Heidenberger, Chevy Chase, MD, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SPORKIN, District Judge.

On December 6, 1994 the Court of Appeals issued an order in which it stated that the mandamus action pending before it, brought by the Federal Republic of Germany against this Court, might "become moot" if this Court ruled promptly on plaintiff's November 18, 1994 motion for clarification of its order dated October 14, 1994. That order granted plaintiff leave to amend his complaint to join BASF...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases