ERICSSON GE MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INC. v. U.S.

Court No. 91-09-00703. Slip Op. 94-55.

850 F.Supp. 34 (1994)

ERICSSON GE MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INC., Murata Mfg. Co., Ltd. et al., Matsushita Electric Corp. of America et al., OKI Electric Industry Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Electric Corp. et al., TDK Corp. of America, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, Motorola, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor.

United States Court of International Trade.

April 5, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sharretts, Paley, Carter & Blauvelt, P.C., Gail T. Cumins and Ned H. Marshak, New York City, for plaintiff Ericsson GE Mobile Communications, Inc.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges, Jeffrey L. Kessler, Martin S. Hyman, and Katherine A. Suprenant, New York City, for plaintiff Matsushita Elec. Corp.

Baker & McKenzie, Thomas Peele, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs Mitsubishi Elec. Corp. and Mitsubishi Consumer Electronics America, Inc.

Arnold & Porter, Richard A. Johnson, Michael T. Shor, and Susan T. Morita, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs Murata Mfg. Co., Ltd., and Murata Erie North America.

Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, Ronald I. Meltzer and Robert C. Cassidy, Jr., Washington, DC, for plaintiff OKI Elec. Co., Ltd.

Katten, Muchin & Zavis, Mark S. Zolno, James M. Lyons, and Robert F. Seely, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff TDK Corp. of America.

Frank W. Hunger, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Civil Div., Commercial Litigation Branch, U.S. Dept. of Justice, A. David Lafer, Michelle Behaylo, Attorney-Advisor, Office of the Chief Counsel for Import Admin., U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, DC, of counsel, for defendant.

Motorola, Inc., Timothy Harr, Washington, DC, for defendant-intervenor.


OPINION

CARMAN, Judge:

Plaintiffs contest the Department of Commerce's (Commerce) remand results in Final Ruling — Scope Remand Ericsson GE Mobile Communications Inc., et al. v. United States (1993) (Remand Determination). Defendant and defendant-intervenor seek to have the remand determination sustained. The Court retained jurisdiction over this matter during the pendency of Commerce's remand investigation.

BACKGROUND

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases