U.S. v. THOMPSON

No. 94-3269.

40 F.3d 48 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, v. Roscoe B. THOMPSON, a/k/a Rudolph Sinclair; Benjamin Garland, II, a/k/a James P. Morgan, Roscoe B. Thompson, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided November 14, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas S. White, Karen Sirianni Gerlach, Michael D. Bartko, Office of Federal Public Defender, Pittsburgh, PA, for appellant.

Frederick W. Thieman, Bonnie R. Schlueter, Michael L. Ivory, Office of U.S. Atty., Pittsburgh, PA, for appellee.

Before: STAPLETON, HUTCHINSON and GARTH, Circuit Judges.


Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) October 25, 1994.

OPINION OF THE COURT

GARTH, Circuit Judge:

The question we must answer on this appeal is whether a sentence for money laundering under § 2S1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines should be based on the total value of the funds involved in that offense or should it be based on the actual loss sustained by the victims. We reject Thompson's "actual loss" argument which is based on the measurement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases