LIEBELT v. LIEBELT

No. 20171.

870 P.2d 9 (1994)

125 Idaho 302

Carol M. LIEBELT, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Kenneth H. LIEBELT, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

March 3, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cox & Ohman, Idaho Falls, for appellant. John Ohman argued.

Edward W. Pike and Todd R. Erikson, Idaho Falls, for respondent. Todd R. Erikson argued.


WALTERS, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal following a remand for supplemental findings in a divorce action. As in the first appeal, the central issue concerns the magistrate's decision to set aside the parties' prenuptial agreement. Based upon the magistrate's supplemental findings, we now affirm the magistrate's divorce decree. In so doing, we also uphold the magistrate's division of the parties' property, an issue raised but not reviewed in the earlier appeal.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases