1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 209 A.D.2d
  5. 209 A.D.2d 670 (1994)
 

HOUSBERG v. BAKER

209 A.D.2d 670 (1994)

619 N.Y.S.2d 956

Mortimer Housberg et al., Respondents, v. Hal Baker, Appellant, et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 28, 1994

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly found that the second cause of action of the amended complaint, which sounds in legal malpractice, seeks damages for breach of contract. Thus, it is not barred by the three-year Statute of Limitations found in CPLR 214 (6) (see, Santulli v Englert, Reilly & McHugh, 78 N.Y.2d 700, 709). In addition, the Supreme Court properly denied the appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases