Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial because the prosecutor improperly cross-examined his alibi witness regarding his failure to contact law enforcement authorities prior to the trial. We find that this contention is unpreserved for appellate review, and, in any event, it is without merit. A sufficient foundation was laid for the cross-examination (see, People v Dawson,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
