CRAMER v. WINNICK


162 Misc.2d 715 (1994)

619 N.Y.S.2d 233

Allen Cramer et al., Plaintiffs, v. Wayne Winnick, Defendant.

Supreme Court, New York County.

October 4, 1994


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Podlofsky, Orange & Widowski, New York City (Ira C. Podlofsky of counsel), for defendant. Robert G. Whiteman, New York City, for plaintiffs.


STANLEY L. SKLAR, J.

The issue presented is whether the defendant is entitled to a new physical examination of the plaintiff, to substitute for the examination already held, because defense counsel recently received important information about the original examining physician. I hold that the defendant is not entitled to a new examination.

Defendant seeks a new physical examination of plaintiff Allen...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases